The Metropolitan Police is not managing the risks posed by registered sex offenders and online child abusers “effectively”, a report from the police inspectorate has found.
The force’s crime investigations also suffer from “inconsistent decision-making” and arguments, with inexperienced officers trying to manage more than 25 crimes at once, according to the report.
His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services shared the findings from its 2023-25 inspection programme, which assesses the effectiveness, efficiency and legitimacy of police forces in England and Wales.
It graded the Met’s performance across eight areas of policing and found the force was adequate in one area, requires improvement in five areas and was inadequate in two areas – investigating crime, and managing offenders and suspects.
In the “managing offenders and suspects” section, inspectors identified a lack of training in both the process of managing suspects and offenders, and in use of the Violent and Sex Offender Register.
In one particular example, a high-risk registered sex offender had not been successfully visited by officers or team members since 2017.
“As such, this individual and the risk they pose to the community wasn’t being managed,” the report said.
The inspection found there was “no proactive consideration” of arresting the individual or issuing a warrant.
More generally, it found that too many visits to registered sex offenders were announced in advance, potentially allowing the offender to conceal any prohibited devices and therefore appear to pose less risk.
A performance report provided to inspectors highlighted the Met had a “no further action” rate of 60% for “indecent imagery of children” investigations.
Officers and staff outside the online child sexual abuse and exploitation team did not have access to a digital triage, meaning officers “must guess which devices could have indecent images on them”.
Only two devices can be submitted to the unit at one time, which “increases the likelihood that investigative opportunities are being missed”, the report said.
Under the “investigating crime” section, the inspectorate found the force’s crime allocation policy led to “inconsistent decision-making across the force, and to arguments about who should investigate what”.
There were examples during the inspection of complex crimes being allocated to officers with only “basic investigative training”, while supervisors in investigation teams had little or no training in how to manage crime workloads, the report said.
The quality of investigations for neighbourhood crimes was “generally poor” and lines of enquiry were not always identified or pursued.
It also found the Met does not consistently help victims to access their rights, as laid out in the Victims’ Code, and it doesn’t always recognise when a victim is entitled to an enhanced service.
Among its recommendations, the inspectorate called for the Met to immediately review its operating model for the teams responsible for the day-to-day management of registered sex offenders and online child sexual abuse and exploitation.
His Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary Lee Freeman said: “The unique challenges facing the Metropolitan Police are not underestimated. Policing the capital city places additional strain on the force and its leadership, as the force tirelessly manages protests, state visits and royal occasions, and national and international sporting events.
“While it was evident in my inspection that many key changes have and are being made, they are not yet translating into consistent and sustained improvements in some key areas.
“While I commend the force for the progress it has made in answering the public’s calls quickly, I have serious concerns about how the force is currently investigating crime and how it manages offenders and suspects.
“I am aware that before our inspection, the force had already recognised the need to achieve better outcomes for victims. However, these plans have not yet led to consistent improvements across the whole force, and more work needs to be done to make sure that this happens.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article