SIR: I refer to your news item in which Ruth Kelly claimed that money spent paying for assisted places would be better spent reducing class sizes in infant schools.
She does not explain where the money will come from to pay for the education of the children denied assisted places who will have to be educated in the state sector.
Will it mean bigger classes at secondary level? Will they have to share books and desks, or will the Labour Party provide extra money to the secondary sector to meet the cost of the influx of children denied assisted places in independent schools?
In Bolton we are extremely fortunate in having an outstanding independent school, Bolton School. It is recognised by the Government as being in the top 30 secondary schools in the country. Why should the opportunity of an education at this outstanding school be denied to children of parents with limited income?
It is wrong for Labour to preserve this opportunity for the children of the wealthy. Because that will be the affect of their action.
Michael Griffiths,
Fall Birch Road,
Lostock.B
Converted for the new archive on 14 July 2000. Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article