SIR: I refer to E J Mullineux's comments (June 11). In imposing a smoking ban at the new stadium, the directors of BWFC are catering for the majority. What E J Mullineux fails to appreciate is that, while in the open, the risk of being forced into passive smoking is minimised. It is still there. A point I feel that, sub-consciously, he/she is aware of in view of the comment - "I can see that the family stand should be non-smoking". If there is no risk, then this area should be no different. However, I feel that the vast consensus of fair-minded people would agree that, open air or not, if you are seated next to someone who is smoking, this will inevitably lead to inhalation of their smoke.
In response to the statement of never having heard a complaint about smoking, one can only assume this is due to the reply that people are generally given upon complaints about smoking. This usually contains some reference to car emissions or some other unrelated subject, prior to being told "well you can always move". Well, this is not possible when tied to a seat for the duration of the season.
So, E J Mullineux, far from being unreasonable, I feel the ban does not go far enough and should be extended to the entire ground.
Dave Wright
Arlington Street, Bolton
Converted for the new archive on 14 July 2000. Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article