BOLTON and Bury Chamber has initiated a national campaign to stamp out a new energy tax on business.
It is claimed that -- in combination with the recently introduced Climate Change Levy -- it could add 20 per cent to the bills of energy intensive companies.
In partnership with its energy service providers Utility Auditing Ltd, the Chamber is campaigning against the Renewables Obligation which is due to be introduced in January, 2002.
The Renewables Obligation is a proposed tax on energy suppliers to encourage them to generate electricity from renewable sources, but the Chamber believes that it won't motivate suppliers to go 'green' because they won't have to pay the penalties direct as they are entitled to pass costs on to businesses.
As well as alerting local MPs, the Chamber has used the British Chambers of Commerce's (BCC) lobbying power to take the issue direct to the Chancellor.
In a series of recommendations for the November 27 Pre Budget Review, the BCC is urging Gordon Brown to delay the introduction of the flawed Renewables Obligation.
Mr Jeff Wealands of Utility Auditing said: "This is a laudable project to reduce CO2 emissions and is the equivalent of The Climate Change Levy for suppliers. "However, suppliers will be allowed to 'pass through' the levy to the end user and therefore have little incentive to adopt renewable energy.
"We are aware that some suppliers are building in an amount to cover the extra cost, which equates to a 'real 'increase of between 2 and 3.5 per cent to large users in the current marketplace.
"Added to the extra burden of The Climate Change Levy, some energy intensive companies could see an overall increase in their electricity costs of 20 per cent in less than 12 months."
Further information is available from the Chamber Energy team at Utility Auditing Ltd on 0161-848 9100
BOLTON and Bury Chamber has initiated a national campaign to stamp out a new energy tax on business.
It is claimed that - in combination with the recently introduced Climate Change Levy - it could add 20 per cent to the bills of energy intensive companies.
In partnership with its energy service providers Utility Auditing Ltd, the Chamber is campaigning against the Renewables Obligation which is due to be introduced in January, 2002.
The Renewables Obligation is a proposed tax on energy suppliers to encourage them to generate electricity from renewable sources, but the Chamber believes that it won't motivate suppliers to go 'green' because they will not have to pay the penalties direct as they are entitled to pass costs on to businesses.
As well as alerting local MPs, the Chamber has used the British Chambers of Commerce's (BCC) lobbying power to take the issue direct to the Chancellor.
In a series of recommendations for the November 27 Pre Budget Review, the BCC is urging Gordon Brown to delay the introduction of the flawed Renewables Obligation.
Further information is available from the Chamber Energy team at Utility Auditing Ltd on 0161-848 9100.
Mr Jeff Wealands of Utility Auditing said: "This is a laudable project to reduce CO2 emissions and is the equivalent of The Climate Change Levy for suppliers. However, suppliers will be allowed to 'pass through' the levy to the end user and therefore have little incentive to adopt renewable energy.
"We are aware that some suppliers are building in an amount to cover the extra cost, which equates to a 'real 'increase of between 2 and 3.5 per cent to large users in the current marketplace.
"Added to the extra burden of The Climate Change Levy, some energy intensive companies could see an overall increase in their electricity costs of 20 per cent in less than 12 months."
Further information is available from the Chamber Energy team at Utility Auditing Ltd on 0161-848 9100.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article