IT'S all very nice to see the gentle pictures of Sandra Lennon with her baby Joshua but I still think anyone having a baby at 57 is bonkers.
There are some circumstances in which it might be more generally acceptable. A mother having a baby for a daughter unable to conceive, for example, would be one.
Sandra Lennon may understandably want a child with new husband Michael, 47. But there is no getting away from the fact that when Joshua is going through a rebellious stage at 16, she'll be 74.
What really irritates me -- and possibly millions of other viewers -- is that the BBC helped foot the bill for IVF because they were filming the treatment, pregnancy and birth for a documentary.
If that's how they're going to spend our licence money, I'd like a refund, please.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article