I READ with interest Cllr Harkin's recent letter, but was not convinced by any of his points or comments.

He quotes the speed we drive in residential areas as a main cause of pedestrian injuries, yet, according to letters to the Bolton Evening News, in two separate studies of these type of accidents, speed was not a factor.

I would also question the claim that, in areas where road humps are to be installed, 85 to 90 per cent of residents are in favour. Is this 85 to 90 per cent of all residents, or 85 to 90 per cent of the people who could be bothered to fill in the questionnaire? And, according to the letter from Craig Howarth from the Highfield Road area, would they know what they where letting themselves in for?

I would also add, since when have politicians been interested in public opinion? I wonder if, a few months ago, the local council had asked the Bolton public if they should shut The Water Place because it was losing money -- I could really see them going along with the majority on that one!

But from a motorist's point of view, Cllr Harkin's measures are too severe, and with this in mind I have a suggestion. Why not adopt the calming method now used in many small villages, which is, instead of raised humps, orange strips are laid across the road every 100/200m with the speed limit encircled on them in both directions?

This has the effect of constantly reminding the driver of the limit for the road they are on, and thus promotes more responsible driving. This method would also have the advantages of not delaying the emergency services, not causing discomfort to drivers and passengers in both cars and buses, especially the people who suffer painful health problems. It would eliminate the speed up/slow down effect of humps which increases pollution. It would also cut out the noise of lorries going over the humps and it would save the council money as far less asphalt and digging is required.

J Parker

Fair Street

Bolton