The BBC has said it is "shocked" at former presenter Huw Edwards' "abhorrent behaviour" after he admitted to accessing indecent photographs of children as young as seven.
62-year-old Edwards arrived at Westminster Magistrates’ Court today (July 31) as he faced three charges of making indecent images of children.
Edwards accessed hundreds of images after a man he met online sent him them on WhatsApp.
A BBC spokesperson said: “The BBC is shocked to hear the details which have emerged in court today.
BREAKING: Huw Edwards would have been sacked over 'abhorrent' images of children, the BBC has said in a statement
— Sky News (@SkyNews) July 31, 2024
Full story: https://t.co/TJlzPKU174
📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube pic.twitter.com/OWx6VvjSVF
“There can be no place for such abhorrent behaviour and our thoughts are with all those affected.
“The police have confirmed that the charges are not connected to the original complaint raised with the BBC in the summer of 2023, nevertheless in the interests of transparency we think it important to set out some points about events of the last year.
“In November 2023, whilst Mr Edwards was suspended, the BBC as his employer at the time was made aware in confidence that he had been arrested on suspicion of serious offences and released on bail whilst the police continued their investigation.
Recommended reading:
- What is the meaning behind category A, B and C indecent images? Legal firm explains
"At the time, no charges had been brought against Mr Edwards and the BBC had also been made aware of significant risk to his health.
“Today we have learnt of the conclusion of the police process in the details as presented to the court. If at any point during the period Mr Edwards was employed by the BBC he had been charged, the BBC had determined it would act immediately to dismiss him. In the end, at the point of charge he was no longer an employee of the BBC.
“During this period, in the usual way, the BBC has kept its corporate management of these issues separate from its independent editorial functions. We want to reiterate our shock at Mr Edwards’ actions and our thoughts remain with all those affected.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article