I WAS shocked to hear at the recent planning committee meeting that Bolton Council's planning officers felt the need to withdraw one of the four strands on which they are defending the decision to deny permission to build 300 homes on Lee Hall, Westhoughton.
The decision to withdraw was based on a recent planning appeal for Blackrod, a decision I fully believe to be bad law. The Blackrod decision prevents councils from being able to rely on their housing development plans; plans that cost a lot of time and vast sums of taxpayers' money to put together.
The decision states that councils can't rely on developments granted planning permission when deciding whether to grant more planning permission in an area and must instead only look at developments that have either started building or have been built.
This is ludicrous and empowers developers to sit on vast swathes of land without building anything, in order to force councils to allow them to build on cheaper-to-develop land. This is a decision that needs to be challenged, and challenged soon.
Planning appeal decisions are not binding on later cases — they do not set precedents. Nevertheless, by withdrawing this strand of the Lee Hall defence, Bolton Council is supporting the idea that the Blackrod decision is correct and making it more difficult to challenge this decision at a later date.
My Conservative colleagues and I voted to keep this strand of the Lee Hall defence in place at the planning meeting but, sadly, we were voted down by the Labour group. I feel this was the wrong decision by Labour, and it weakens our ability to defend our case unnecessarily.
Cllr Zoë Kirk-Robinson,
Westhoughton North and Chew Moor
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here